top of page
Search

Trapped in the Gulf: Europe’s New Diesel and Gasoline Sources

  • 1 day ago
  • 8 min read

Enerdealers Editorial




For traders, suppliers, and large buyers, the key issue is not just that prices moved higher. The bigger story is that Europe’s fuel system is being re‑routed around a geopolitical chokepoint, with more reliance on Atlantic Basin barrels, more pressure on middle distillates, and more competition for prompt cargoes. In this new market, origin matters again, but so do timing, freight, product specification, and the distinction between crude and refined products.


Europe’s Core Exposure


Europe is not directly dependent on Iranian crude, but it is exposed to any disruption that hits the Strait of Hormuz because the strait is a central corridor for global oil and fuel trade. Bruegel estimated that oil prices jumped about 8% and European gas prices about 20% on the morning of 2 March, underscoring how quickly a Gulf shock is transmitted into European energy markets.


The main physical vulnerability is not crude alone; it is refined products, especially diesel and jet fuel. OPIS reported that Europe and the U.K. imported 9.7 million metric tons of jet fuel from Kuwait in 2025, equal to 36% of regional consumption, and those flows were disrupted when Hormuz transit was effectively shut. That matters because middle distillates are harder to replace than gasoline in the short term.


Main EU Import Sources: Crude vs Refined Products


Crude Oil: The Upstream Backbone


For crude oil, the EU’s import map has shifted dramatically since the Russia‑Ukraine war. In 2024, the EU imported 9.1 million barrels per day (Mb/d) of crude oil. The United States was the largest supplier at 1.40 Mb/d (15.4%), followed by Norway at 1.10 Mb/d (12.1%), and Kazakhstan at 1.05 Mb/d (11.5%). Other major suppliers included Libya (0.67 Mb/d, 7.4%), Saudi Arabia (0.66 Mb/d, 7.2%), Iraq (0.57 Mb/d, 6.3%), Nigeria (0.54 Mb/d, 5.9%), Brazil (0.45 Mb/d, 4.9%), and the United Kingdom (0.41 Mb/d, 4.6%).


Kazakhstan’s share of 11.5% makes it the third‑largest crude supplier to the EU. This crude feeds European refineries that produce diesel, gasoline, jet fuel, and other products. So while Kazakhstan is not a major direct exporter of finished diesel or gasoline to Europe, its crude is a key upstream input into the EU’s fuel supply chain.


Azerbaijan is more important for gas than for refined products. In 2024, EU countries imported approximately 17.27 million tonnes of oil from Azerbaijan (down 14.9% from 2023), worth €10.277 billion. In Q1 2025, EU oil imports from Azerbaijan rose 9% year‑on‑year to over 4.101 million tonnes, with Italy, the Czech Republic, Germany, Romania, and Croatia as the top importers. However, Azerbaijan’s role in the EU fuel mix is dominated by natural gas: in 2025 it delivered about 12.5 bcm to the EU, roughly 4% of total EU gas imports, via the Southern Gas Corridor to Italy, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Serbia, Croatia, and Slovenia.


There is also a sanctions‑related nuance: the EU’s sanctions on Russian oil have extended to Azerbaijan’s state‑owned STAR Refinery in Turkey, banning imports of refined products from that refinery. That limits the extent to which Azerbaijan can act as a refined‑product supplier to the EU, even though its crude can still flow more freely.


While Kazakhstan is not a major direct exporter of finished diesel or gasoline to Europe, its crude is a key upstream input into the EU’s fuel supply chain.


Refined Products: Diesel and Gasoline


For diesel and gasoline specifically, the EU’s main sources are different. S&P Global reported that Europe’s diesel trade map has been redrawn following the Russia‑Ukraine conflict, with the Middle East as the largest supplier bloc, followed by the United States, India, and Africa, while Russian flows have been reduced to about 5% of Europe’s diesel supply.


Eurostat and World Bank WITS data show that in 2023, the top partner regions and countries from which the EU imported fuels included the Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, and Algeria. Another WITS table lists the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, Special Categories, and Algeria as the top fuel import partners. These datasets cover both crude and refined products, but the refined‑product side is dominated by the same Atlantic and regional suppliers.


India deserves special attention because it has become an important swing supplier of refined products to Europe. OPIS reported in February 2026 that the EU received its first cargo of Indian diesel after a six‑week hiatus: a 105,000‑ton LR2 tanker from Reliance’s Jamnagar refinery discharged in Rotterdam. This is Indian diesel that is explicitly compliant with EU rules on Russian crude feedstock. A further 567,000 tons from Jamnagar was provisionally scheduled to arrive in March, though still far below the monthly high of 1.02 million tons seen in October 2025.






Diesel Versus Gasoline


Diesel is the more sensitive market because Europe is structurally short of middle distillates. That means any loss of Gulf‑linked supply tends to show up first in diesel cracks, freight costs, and industrial margins, especially for road transport and agriculture. Trans.info reported that the war pushed German diesel prices above €2 per liter, showing how quickly supply anxiety turns into downstream cost pressure.


Gasoline is less tight physically, but it is still affected through crude prices, freight, and arbitrage. Europe can source gasoline from a broader set of refiners, including the U.S. Gulf Coast and regional European hubs, yet the whole pool becomes more expensive when the Middle East is unstable and when cargoes are pulled away from their usual destinations. In practice, gasoline is re‑priced by the same shock even if it is not as vulnerable to outright shortage as diesel.


Jet fuel sits between the two, but its logistics are the most fragile. Airports Council International warned that European airports could face a systemic shortage if Hormuz did not reopen quickly, and several reports noted that reserves in some countries cover only about eight to ten days of consumption. For aviation buyers, that means physical availability and not just price has become the issue.


Route Reconfiguration


The first major rerouting is away from Gulf transit and toward Atlantic Basin supply. That means more barrels from the United States, more use of European refining centers such as Rotterdam and Antwerp, and more opportunistic flows from India when compliance and freight conditions fit. The EU Commission has also discussed mapping transport fuel supplies and coordinating alternative sourcing, which shows that the response is now being managed at policy level as well as by traders.


The second rerouting is regional and operational. As cargoes arrive in Europe, they are increasingly allocated to the most constrained markets first, rather than following a purely price‑driven logic. This favors buyers with storage, flexibility, and strong logistics networks, because prompt product has become more valuable than theoretical long‑term supply.


The third shift is that Europe is now competing harder for every non‑Gulf cargo. A supply interruption in the Strait of Hormuz does not only remove one source; it pulls the whole global product balance tighter, so Europe must bid against Asia, Latin America, and local demand in the Atlantic Basin. That competition is why freight, premiums, and cargo timing have become as important as outright FOB prices.


Supply Comparison: Crude vs Refined Products


Category

Main EU suppliers

What changed after Hormuz shock

Market implication

Crude oil

United States, Norway, Kazakhstan, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Nigeria, Brazil, U.K.

Kazakhstan and Norway rose as Russia’s share collapsed; Gulf crude still important but more volatile

Refinery feedstock is more diversified, but Gulf disruptions still lift global crude prices

Diesel

Middle East, United States, India, Africa

Less reliance on Russian barrels; more competition for non‑Gulf cargoes

Tightest product, biggest price and availability risk

Gasoline

United States, Europe, North Africa, Middle East

More Atlantic Basin sourcing and refinery optimization

Less physical risk, strong price pass‑through

Jet fuel

Kuwait/Gulf‑linked supply, United States, Europe

Gulf disruption hit directly through Kuwait‑Europe flows

Highest near‑term shortage risk


Kazakhstan’s role is upstream: it is a top‑3 crude supplier to the EU, feeding refineries that make diesel and gasoline, but it is not a major direct exporter of finished diesel or gasoline.


Azerbaijan’s role is mixed but gas‑dominated: it exports crude oil to the EU (notably to Italy, the Czech Republic, Germany, Romania, and Croatia), but its refined‑product exports are limited, and sanctions on its STAR Refinery in Turkey block some refined‑product flows. Given its gas importance, Azerbaijan is often seen as an energy partner, but not a key diesel/gasoline source in the same way as the U.S., India, or the Middle East.


U.S. cargoes are long‑haul but deep, Norway and Kazakhstan are stable feedstock sources, Algeria and Libya are regionally useful, and India is flexible but sensitive to feedstock and sanctions compliance.


What Decision Makers Should Track


The first indicator to watch is whether Gulf transit normalizes or remains constrained. If closure or disruption persists, Europe will keep paying up for prompt diesel and jet fuel, while gasoline will remain more exposed to macro pricing than to direct shortages. If the strait reopens, the physical pressure may ease faster than the pricing pressure, because supply chains and inventories will need time to reset.


The second indicator is supplier availability. The United States, Norway, Kazakhstan, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Nigeria, Brazil, the U.K., Algeria, and India now matter more than ever because they anchor the EU’s replacement basket. But each source behaves differently: U.S. cargoes are long‑haul but deep, Norway and Kazakhstan are stable feedstock sources, Algeria and Libya are regionally useful, and India is flexible but sensitive to feedstock and sanctions compliance.


The third indicator is the distillate crack spread. Diesel and jet fuel are where the market stress appears first, so buyers should focus on prompt premiums, freight, and stock coverage rather than only headline crude prices. That is where the real cost of Hormuz disruption is being transferred into European balance sheets.



Conclusion


Europe’s fuel supply has not collapsed, but it has become more complex, more expensive, and more dependent on a wider and less predictable set of suppliers. The United States, Norway, Kazakhstan, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Nigeria, Brazil, the U.K., Algeria, India, and regional European hubs now play a larger role in keeping diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel flowing, while the Gulf shock has pushed the market toward tighter inventory management and stronger logistical discipline.


For traders and buyers, the message is straightforward: route security is now a core pricing variable. In a market shaped by Hormuz risk, the best supply is no longer simply the cheapest one; it is the one that can arrive on time, meet specification, and survive the next geopolitical shock. Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan illustrate the broader lesson: crude and gas suppliers are critical to the upstream backbone, but diesel and gasoline security still depend on refined‑product flows from the Middle East, the U.S., India, and regional European refining capacity.




Sources

Kazakhstan crude oil sources
Azerbaijan oil, gas, and refined products sources

Subscribe to get exclusive updates

Media and News

Let's shape together the future of energy!

For more information, please contact to our team: media@enerdealers.com

bottom of page