We are deeply honoured to be recognised as Best Consulting Firm 2026 at the Spanish Business Awards 2026 by EU Business News. This award is not only a recognition of Enerdealers’ work, but a reflection of the collective effort, trust, and commitment of an extraordinary ecosystem that has supported us throughout our journey.

Global trade is facing a structural disruption that extends well beyond the initial oil price spike triggered by geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. What began as a security crisis affecting the Strait of Hormuz has evolved into a dual chokepoint disruption, simultaneously impacting the Bab el-Mandeb corridor and forcing a systemic rerouting of maritime trade

Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Georgia are moving to unify long-term tariffs for the Middle Corridor, a step that could reshape the economics of one of Eurasia’s most closely watched trade routes. The push is unfolding alongside a broader Brussels investment drive, where Kazakhstan and European partners signed transport-related deals worth about $462 million and reinforced the route’s strategic role for EU-Asia trade.

The Iran war and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz have not caused a total supply breakdown for Europe, but they have clearly redrawn the continent’s diesel and gasoline map. The result is a faster shift toward the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, India, and regional European hubs, while Gulf‑linked flows have become more expensive, slower, and less reliable.

Enerdealers Editorial The Iran war and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz have not created a total European LNG supply shock, but they have changed the economics, route risk, and origin mix of cargoes flowing into Europe. The result is a market that is still supplied, but more expensive, more competitive, and more dependent on a handful of Atlantic and North Sea suppliers than it was only weeks ago. For traders, buyers, and suppliers, the key issue is no longer whe

Baku Energy Week 2026 arrived with the familiar choreography of an industry showcase, but this year’s edition carried a sharper edge. Held from 1 to 3 June in Azerbaijan’s capital, the gathering once again placed the Caspian state at the center of a dense conversation about gas supply, infrastructure, investment, and the slow, uneven evolution of the energy transition.

One month after the UAE left OPEC, the immediate market impact has been limited, but the strategic implications are already significant. The move has weakened OPEC’s cohesion, increased the medium-term risk of higher UAE supply, and raised the odds of a more volatile and less coordinated oil market over the next year.

The 48th ASEAN Summit in Cebu was not just another diplomatic gathering. It became a stress test for Southeast Asia’s energy system as leaders confronted the spillover effects of the Middle East conflict, rising oil prices and the strategic risk of disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

The United Arab Emirates’ decision to leave OPEC and OPEC+ marks one of the biggest ruptures in oil diplomacy in decades, and it comes at a time when the market is already strained by the Iran war and tight spare capacity. For traders, suppliers, and buyers, the key takeaway is not an immediate supply shock but a structural shift: the UAE is breaking free from quotas to pursue its own production strategy, and that changes the balance inside OPEC and the wider industry.

Enerdealers has reached a defining moment in its sustainability journey. With the formal approval by its board of directors of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines and a structured reporting calendar, the company has moved decisively from ESG ambition to ESG execution.

The war involving Iran has become far more than a regional security crisis. By disrupting the Strait of Hormuz and destabilizing energy, shipping, and insurance markets, it is now hitting the physical and financial plumbing of global trade.

The main message from the FT Commodities Global Summit in Lausanne was that the market is no longer being shaped by supply and demand alone. Traders, producers and policymakers are now operating in a world defined by geopolitics, sanctions risk, tariffs, de-dollarisation, shifting alliances and increasingly volatile trade routes. Reuters’ coverage from the summit shows a sector that is still profit-driven, but far more cautious about where barrels, cargoes and capital will fl

Europe has no shortage of hydrogen ambition. What it still lacks is the combination of regulation, infrastructure, demand certainty, and financing needed to turn plans into bankable projects at scale. That is the gap the new European Resilience Alliance for Clean Hydrogen & Derivatives, or ERA, wants to close.

Temporary U.S. sanctions waivers on Russian and Iranian oil have acted less like a structural reset and more like a pressure valve for a market shocked by the Iran war. They briefly restored supply confidence, softened the immediate risk of a deeper crude and products squeeze, and bought time for refiners, traders and buyers to reposition—but they did not remove the underlying geopolitical premium, especially as the waivers now approach expiry.

The Iran war has moved from a geopolitical event to an industrial market shock. In a matter of days, it disrupted oil, gas, fertilizer and petrochemical flows, then pushed the consequences deep into agriculture, manufacturing and global trade. For decision makers, the key issue is no longer whether prices moved. It is how fast the shock cascaded through supply chains, which products were hit first, and how long the disruption may last.

As crude and LNG flows out of the Gulf are choked by attacks and the near‑closure of the Strait of Hormuz, governments and corporates are reframing renewable energy from a climate option to a national security imperative. This article unpacks what the conflict means for oil and gas balances, how it is reshaping risk premia and supply strategies, and why it is turbo‑charging investment narratives around renewables and storage.

The Trans‑Caspian International Transport Route (TITR) –the Middle Corridor– is emerging from the sidelines as a strategic, if imperfect, alternative for both containerized goods and selected energy flows between Asia and Europe. Initially framed as a workaround to war‑related risks in the Black Sea and the Red Sea, the Middle Corridor is now being stress‑tested by an unprecedented combination of container diversion, fuel trade rerouting and geopolitical pressure.

Spain’s green hydrogen story is moving from strategy papers to bankable reality. The latest milestone is Brussels’ approval of a 440 million euro Spanish aid scheme to support renewable hydrogen production through the European Hydrogen Bank’s “Auctions‑as‑a‑Service” (AaaS) mechanism. This second Spanish participation under the AaaS framework is financed with Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRTR) funds and is explicitly tailored to scale industrial‑grade electrolysis capacity.

The EU is being squeezed between its long-term strategy to phase out Russian energy and short-term pressure to keep fuel prices under control amid war-driven volatility and supply disruptions. At the same time, Washington is moving in the opposite direction, with President Donald Trump signaling a partial easing of oil sanctions on Russia to cool prices, while Brussels publicly rejects any relaxation of its own measures.

The ongoing security crisis in and around the Strait of Hormuz has turned a boilerplate paragraph in oil and gas contracts into a front‑page market driver: the force majeure clause. Roughly 20% of the world’s seaborne oil and a significant share of globally traded LNG normally cross this narrow chokepoint between Iran and Oman, so when tanker traffic drops toward zero the legal and logistical consequences ripple through every refined products desk on the planet.